Should everybody be tested for ApoE4 before going high fat Paleo?
- PaleoHacks.com
| First of all, I'm assuming the hypothesis that ApoE4 carriers (one or two alleles) face the problem of high LDL Cholesterol and TC, probably due to a diet high in saturated fat. If that holds true, and according to various blogs (Dr. Davis, Paul Jaminet and Paleo Hacks to name a few), around 15-25% of the populations will be ApoE4 carriers (source), with 2% being double carrier (worst scenario). Moreover, this condition (in various degrees related to ApoE combinations) could be a problem for newcomers to a high fat paleo diet. Since 1 out 4 is a high proportion it seems to me a safe bet to be tested against ApoE4 before going into a high fat paleo diet. What do you think? Where and how can one be tested about Apoe4? PS.: In my case, although I'm from Spain, I'm pretty sure that I could be an ApoE4 carrier, since my ancestors were from Scotland and the prevalence of this gene seems to be higher there. More Info about ApoE4: |
comments:
| I agree with Cody. I think you need to read these articles again. You seem to be missing the point. – PaleoDel Jan 2 2012 at 17:08 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
answers23and me gives the following statistics for APO E4. Like you said, although about 20% of people have 1 E4, 2 is much less common. ------------------------------APOE variant frequencies in Europeans Genotype Frequency
They also say that while there is evidence that the APOE ε4 variant may associate with higher LDL cholesterol levels, consistent associations have not been demonstrated for coronary heart disease or response to statins.The connection to LDL is complicated. The biggest effect is seen in people with 2 ApoE4s. This study suggests that it only makes a difference if you drink alcohol, for example. This paper, shows a table with the different values of lipid panels associated with the different Apo E combinations. They show, for example that a typical someone with 2 E4's had LDL of 157, a 3 and a 4 with 143, a 4 and a 2 (which was the lowest!) with 101. Here is a paper that acknowledges some of the complexity of the problem: Interestingly, even though both apoE phenotype and diet modify LDL size, studies showing the interaction between these 2 factors are scarce or discrepant. Thus, a higher saturated fat intake was associated with smaller LDL particles in apoE2 subjects, and larger LDL particles in apoE4 subjects (31). However, another study showed that when subjects changed from a high- to a low-fat diet, there was a shift from large, buoyant, cholesterol-rich particles, to smaller, denser LDL particles, with progressively greater reductions in levels of larger LDL from apoE3/2 to apoE3/3 to apoE3/4 (32).These two points strongly suggests that people with Apo E4 should not lower their fat / saturated fat intake! The rest of that study is even more complex, in part because they compare only two conditions (which in my opinion aren't very comparable -- moderately high CHO with moderately high MUFA), and it's really unclear what conclusions to draw. The resulting discussion section is interesting to read, if only to show how little is understood. The authors do conclude something related to your suggestion: that there are many factors which make optimal diet individual. My opinion is that LDL doesn't really matter very much. It has been shown that a diet with plenty of saturated fat often increases LDL, but it also increases the particle size. So it really isn't clear that high LDL in this scenario is dangerous. In fact, if the diet is low in carbs, the larger particle size, combined with the lowered triglycerides, and raised HDL, suggests to me that the perceived risk of higher LDL is more than compensated for. The problem in answering your question is that most studies that compare the cholesterol outcomes of people based on their Apo E variant and fat intake do not have a low carbohydrate intake in mind, and don't test the conditions that would make that part of the picture come into focus. Yes, absolutely... but not for the reasons you imply. APOE4 is not a reason to avoid paleo, but I do think you can use the knowledge that you are APOE4 to find optimums for you. I recently found my way to paleo precisely because I am APOE4. I support answers above from Cody and ambimorph. See my own question and particularly the long discussion in comments here. I particularly draw your attention to the exchange between @Hans and @Grace in the Answers/comments. As you'll see there, my synthesis of all the research I've read to far is that as an APOE4 I actually want higher LDL (for brain health), but that I want to shape the average size to be the large and fluffy type. Notwithstanding measurement uncertainties pointed out by Masterjohn and others, I have gone from 25% to 40% larger LDL on my first 2 VAPs 30 days apart. But I find wisdom in Quilt's post on using VAP tests for broader view of brain/gut health here, although what this means for me is not yet clear. I am currently focusing on raising HDL (stable at 47 mg/dl) using coconut oil, Vitamin D and probiotics (answer from Quilt on another paleohacks Q). Will update my earlier post with results +/- as I go. Bottom line - test for APOE4 for sure, but use this information to find optimal, not to stay away from paleo. So far for me, after ~4 months paleo, I feel better than I have in 20 years, so that's telling me something that for now I take as a net positive. In the end, I won't be surprised that APOE4's, as carriers of the truly ancestral allele of APOE, need paleo even more than others :-) | ||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment